Module 6 opens by emphasizing the pivotal role of culture, gender, and personal values in shaping conflict dynamics. Lecture 1 explores Geert Hofstede’s Cultural Dimensions—such as power distance, individualism vs. collectivism, and uncertainty avoidance—providing real-world examples of how these cultural factors influence communication and decision-making. The lecture also delves into gender norms and power dynamics, illustrating how societal expectations and communication styles can exacerbate conflicts. Finally, students learn how personal values like honesty, tradition, and faith drive deeply-rooted disputes and acquire techniques like deep listening and reframing to mediate value-based conflicts.
Lecture 2 shifts the focus to the mediator’s role, highlighting the importance of cultural fluency and bias awareness in maintaining neutrality. Students learn to recognize diverse communication styles and respect cultural traditions without falling into stereotypes. The lecture addresses the impact of both explicit and implicit biases, offering practical tools—such as self-reflection techniques and structured mediation protocols—to manage biases and foster fairness. By integrating cultural fluency with bias awareness, mediators can design culturally sensitive processes and navigate real-time cultural tensions with confidence.
In Lecture 3, students are introduced to advanced theories for adapting mediation techniques to diverse parties. Edward T. Hall’s concepts of high- and low-context communication and time orientation help mediators understand cultural differences in communication and scheduling. Stella Ting-Toomey’s Face-Negotiation Theory teaches how self-image and dignity influence conflict, while Kevin Avruch’s perspective emphasizes the dynamic and context-specific nature of culture. Together, these theories provide a framework for tailoring mediation processes to respect cultural diversity, avoid overgeneralization, and promote equitable, sustainable conflict resolution.